Why I Believe in Jewish Ritual Murder
Why I Believe in Jewish Ritual Murder
by Winston Smith and Ken Blewitt
Question: Also, I just read about Jewish ritual murder. Do people believe that this is true?
Answer: Yes, I do believe that the Jews have practiced ritual murder as part of their religious ceremonies in the past, and that they almost certainly do so today, with the following qualifiers:
- I do not believe this practice is or ever has been widespread, but has always been restricted to a small number of the most hard-core rabbis and Jewish cabalistic mystic sects;
- I am perfectly willing to accept the likelihood that individual Jews down through history have been falsely accused of this practice, just as I believe that on the other hand it has often been carried out undetected and/or unpunished. The Beiliss case in 1913 Russia is a good case in point: Mendel Beiliss himself was probably innocent of the actual commission of murder although he may have been peripherally involved in covering up the act on the part of his co-religionists;
- I am willing to accept that the overwhelming majority of Jews are unaware that the “blood libel” has at least a partial grounding in fact and genuinely believe it to be a slander, just as most Jews probably believe that the Holocaust occurred more or less as advertised despite mounting evidence to the contrary.
My belief in the preceding is based on two foundations: extensive study of the historical, cultural, and religious aspects of Judaism, and my own personal observation, dealings, and experience with the Jews as individual people over a period of 25 years. I don’t want this e-mail to get too prolix, since this isn’t really my area of enthusiasm -the Jews’ public and political crimes are far worse than their private religious ones -but briefly summarized:
1. There is an immense amount of anecdotal and circumstantial evidence that these sacrificial homicides took place in the past, back in times when concealment was harder and Aryans far more aware and wary of the Jew than they are today.
It is significant that ever since the days of Babylon, a period of almost four thousand years, this accusation (like many others) has been leveled against the Jews EVERYWHERE THEY HAVE EVER RESIDED in the world. Time and again down through the ages the Jews have been caught literally red-handed, in some cases toting the dead body of the child whose blood they have drained away to dispose of it in sacks or wagons, sometimes with the corpse being found in the synagogue cellars, etc.
The Jews’ response to this is “ve is beink poisecute!” They maintain that down through forty centuries of history, there has been a mammoth conspiracy to frame them for ritual murder. According to this theory, in places as far apart as Cochin China, medieval Germany, 1913 Kiev and 1970 Montreal, and among peoples as diverse as knightly Crusaders, Turkish sultans, twelfth-century Yorkshire Saxons, Argentinians, Cossacks, British historians, Renaissance Italian popes, assorted saints and sinners, the burgomeisters of Prague, and modern-day Arabs, there exists one big long, continuous plot periodically to murder small children, drain them of blood, and plant the bodies on Jewish premises or in Jewish vehicles, etc.
That’s one hell of a conspiracy!
There are other similar complaints always leveled against the Jews wherever and whenever they have gone -economic trickery and despoliation, refusal to assimilate, disloyalty to their host country, arrogant behavior and hatred against their hosts, etc. The Jewish response is always the same -for four thousand years, everybody in the world has been engaged in a collossal conspiracy to “get” them. Nowadays most people believe that, not suprising in view of the Jewish control of the media of communications which has existed in varying strengths in the Western world since the late nineteenth century. But in the old days it didn’t wash.
Our medieval ancestors were not fools. They lived with the Jews side by side in close-packed urban communities, very small by modern standards, and knew the Jews far more intimately than we do today. Just like people today, they cared about their children and when a child was slain the entire community interested itself not only for purposes of revenge, but to ensure the safety of everyone’s kids. We are asked to believe that time and again, insular communities who discovered they had a child-killer in their midst stubbornly refused to apprehend the alleged Gentile “real killers” and blamed the Jews out of religious bigotry. What possible interest could any community, medieval or otherwise, have in lynching an innocent scapegoat and allowing a real killer of children to go free? Why would everyone in Trier or Lincoln or Spoleto or Kiev go along with such a miscarriage of justice when doing so put other children at risk? Why (so far as we know) did the child-killings cease once the Jews had been punished and (usually) driven from the community?
2. The Jewish religion allows for and practices animal sacrifice, per the Old Testament or Torah as they call it, although these customs have long been held in abeyance and in theory apply only to the Temple in Jerusalem. There is an entire sect of “Kohanim” in Israel who practice and train successive generations of rabbis in the techniques of sacrifice in anticipation of the day when Israel succeeds in wresting the Al Aqsa mosque away from the Muslims who have held it for 1400 years and rebuilds the Temple. The Talmud teaches that non-Jews are *goyim*, beasts without souls. To a religious Jew there is no difference between a German or an American or an African and a cow or a horse or a fish; all lesser non-Jewish forms of life, humanoid or otherwise, were put here by God to serve and pleasure the Jew. When the Jews claim that they do not practice “human” sacrifice they are by their own weird lights telling the truth. They do not consider Gentiles to be human.
3. For the past 25 years I have been in a unique position to observe Jewish behavior and the Jewish character at first hand, since being a National Socialist they don’t bother to keep their usual variety of masks on with me and they let all that Talmudic hatred hang out. Anyone who has ever done night duty in a National Socialist headquarters and lifted the telephone for call after call, hour after hour, to hear the crazed screaming Brooklynese of a Jew driven mad by hatred, spewing a string of profanity and terms of excrement, raving like some demented parrot or monkey, totally out of all human control -thus begins wisdom. Anyone who wants to understand the true nature of this “Light Unto The Nations” need only oppose them in public, and he will soon find out what utterly loathsome beings the Jews are, what vicious and contemptible cowards they are, what potentially deadly serpents they are.
But don’t take my word for it. Check out the Nizkor playgroups and see for yourself. See a Revisionist post a calm, serious, well-researched comment on some aspect of the Holocaust and then see the literally HUNDREDS of hysterical, malicious, hateful, filthy and abusive posts which follow from the little cadre of about two dozen kikes and kike wannabes who go berserk attacking, vilifying, insulting, and threatening anyone who dares to contradict the self-proclaimed Chosen People of God.
I won’t belabor this further, but I will close with two points:
First off, the Jewish people are entirely capable of practicing ritual murder, and there is an immense amount of historical evidence that they did so. I cannot imagine why they would stop now in this day and age, when they have the power to conceal their misdeeds and the captive media falsely to portray them as victims. How many of those little children you see on milk cartons have fallen victim to the knives of the rabbis and lie buried in some remote wasteland or were ground up into dog food in some Jewish-owned processing plant? I am convinced that at least some of them met that fate.
Secondly, the Jews deserve everything that has happened to them in the past and everything that is coming to them in the future, especially when the Palestinians get their state as a toehold and America finally runs out of money and the New Yahk-Tel Aviv lifeline collapses. I do not question that innocent individuals of Jewish extraction have suffered down through the ages for crimes which they as individuals did not commit -but my people and all the peoples of the world have suffered far more at the hands of the Chosen Ones.
The Jews are great survivors, got to give them that. Like rats and cockroaches, and like rats and cockroaches I doubt we’ll ever get rid of them entirely. But the world is a much smaller place now, global village and all that. It used to be they could just move on to the next “Goldeneh Medina” when they wore out their welcome somewhere else -but they can’t to that any more. Everybody knows about them now, from Uganda to Honolulu, from Rome to Regina. They’ve run out of trap doors to dodge through and run out of places to run and hide. Their much-vaunted Israel is going to end up nothing but a death trap.
There is a reckoning coming, a reckoning between humanity and the Jewish people which will cause the very heavens to darken and the very devils in hell to hide their faces in shock and terror. You might say we owe them a Holocaust. We’ve been paying their bill for fifty years, and at some point we’re finally going to get what we’ve paid for.
And when that day comes, who knows? Even I might pity them…..
Naaaaah!
–Winston Smith
I am confident that Jewish ritual murder is not a myth.
I do not think that the typical Jew is responsible for this vindictive practice, or that he should be hated because of it. Yet I think the Jewish group does contain a highly vindictive element – and ritual murder is a reality.
What is ritual murder? The Jews believe that the soul or life-essence is a sort of transcendental liquid or vapor that is found in the blood. They are forbidden to eat blood for this reason – for to do so would entail defecating the soul of the animal. The animal’s soul would suffer the experience of being defecated, that is. In the case of enemies, however, this good natured concern is turned around. Enemies of the Jews are enemies of God – therefore, absolute hatred is in order. Thus, to defecate the soul of an enemy of the Jews is an expression of the love of God.
For unknown reasons the victim is always a male, and is usually a young boy (though Catholic priests are also selected). The victim is bled to death and the blood is collected in a basin. While the victim is bleeding to death he is tortured with puncture wounds. Finally, the collected blood is mixed in with the dough of the unleavened bread that the Jews eat on certain of their holy days.
Roughly speaking, that is the claim of ritual murder.
According to Arnold Leese, Director-General of the Imperial Fascist League of England, evidence for the existence of ritual murder is abundant in the court records of the peoples of northern Europe. Leese wrote a book in which he listed what he considered to be cases that were probably true. My copy of this book was destroyed recently in a flood, but as I recall the number of believable cases that Leese listed was in excess of 100.
In addition, here are some quotes from Sir Richard F. Burton’s essay, “The Jew,” concerning the subjects of Jewish vindictiveness and ritual murder. Burton was the British Consul at Damascus, and was considered to have intimate knowledge of Eastern races and languages:
“The most important and pregnant tenet of modern Jewish belief is that the Ger, or Stranger, in fact all those who do not belong to their religion, are brute beasts, having no more rights than the fauna of the field.”
“A people which has such a vindictive Oral Law is sure to excite the spirit of retaliation, for obviously the Law exists not merely in the letter, but in the spirit.”
“From the earliest ages to these modern days, and not in one place, but all the world over, the hatred of Jews against non-Jews has been the fiercest. Those who are so ready to admit and deplore the mighty provocations which roused a spirit of retaliation in the Rabbinical mind should equally make allowance for the natural feelings of the unfortunate Gentiles and heathens when the ‘People of the Synagogue’ had their wicked will.”
“A.D. 1495. The Jews of Trent, by means of one of their number, a physician, decoyed to his house, while the Christians were at church, it being Maunday Thursday, a boy two years and a half old, by name Simeon, the son of a tanner. Before the Paschal festival commenced, the principal Jews collected in a room near their synagogue. The child, gagged with a kerchief, was extended in the form of a cross, and was held down by his murderers. The blood, pouring from heavy gashes, was collected in a basin, and when death was near the victim was placed upon his legs by the two men, and the others pierced his body with sharp instruments, all vying in brutality and enjoying the torture. The corpse having been found in the Etsch river, which flows through the city, led to the detection of the crime; the murderers were put to death, the synagogue was razed to the ground, and a church was built over the place where the horrid deed was done. A sculpture was put on the Bridge Tower in Frankfort-on-the Maine, and a picture of a ‘Christian Infant Murdered by the Jews’ was placed in one of the galleries of the Hotel de Ville. In late years it has been removed, in deference to the feelings of the Hebrew community, which, in late years, has formed a large and important section of the commercial population. This murder has been abundantly commented upon. Dr. John Matthias Tiberinus, in Trent at the time, and Jacobus Philippus Bergamensis, of the Order of the Hermits of St. Augustine, who was then living at the neighboring town of Bergamo, gave accounts of it; whilst an engraving was produced in the Chronicles of John Louis Gottfried, edited by Matthaeus Merianus. On the other hand, Pietro Mocenigo, the Doge of Venice, and his Senate asserted: ‘Credimus certe rumorem ipsum de puero necato commentum esse et artem; ad quem finem, viderint et interpretentur alii.’”
– Ken Blewitt
