'Racism' Lets Stop the Haters
Source: Spearhead, PO Box 117, Welling, Kent DA16 3DW.
‘Racism’
Let’s Stop the Haters, Says Ian Buckley
Spearhead – September 1998
NOTHING is more satisfying than turning the tables on one’s opponents, and that is what I propose to do in this article, by taking a closer look at their support for so-called ‘anti-racism’.
The ideology of anti-racism is now deeply embedded in the thinking (using the term in the loosest possible sense) of all the Establishment parties. This in itself should raise suspicion among the intelligent and open-minded, for the world is not run by idealists and romantics, and never has been. In fact, more of the worst and most criminal elements have greater power today than at any previous time in the history of civilisation.
In America especially, politics attracts men and women who are in reality often the leading criminals of the day, but who are clever enough to use the ‘politics racket’ as the quickest, safest and easiest way of enriching themselves. The sleaze we see in government is just the tip of the iceberg, with many more major crimes and evasions hidden away until much later. The recent news snippet that historians are unable to account for former President Lyndon Johnson’s multi-million dollar fortune is typical.
So we sense a contradiction here. How can a supposedly idealistic ideology be espoused by people whose bottom line is money and power? Because, in truth, the real motive force of ‘anti-racism’ is very far from being idealistic. The logical, and intended, conclusion of ‘anti-racism’ is the genocide of every distinct racial grouping, and the substitution of a melange world of near-slaves; it is in reality the supreme and most pernicious form of racial hatred. And this racism, naturally, is upheld and encouraged by international capitalism, which likes nothing better than a cheap, atomised and compliant workforce, with no pride in itself and no sense of folk culture or identity as the basis from which to resist exploitation.
A McDonalds diner shines above the shanties, neon lighting and petrol-ooze. Could be Manila, Birmingham, Mexico City or Shanghai. “Have a nice day in the eternal darkness, sir!”
While the internationalists are as happy to exploit non-whites as they are us, it is white people who are the chief the chief targets of the liberal media’s racial contempt. The soap opera Eastenders produced a particularly outrageous episode of racial hatred directed against the Irish, in which the inhabitants of an Irish village were depicted as stupid, feckless and boorish. Reserved for special attack was the Irish male, condemned for being lustful and anti-feminist. Cardinal sins! They should all have been homosexuals, transvestites or, at the very least, ‘new men’.
A fascinating detail of the programme was the open contempt heaped by the scriptwriters on large families — another black mark against the `primitive’ Irish. When will they catch up and have abortions with equal alacrity as a cup of tea?
whole episode seemed to me to be closely related to the Hollywood vendetta, pursued in dozens of films like Deliverance, against ‘Hillbillies’, who are apparently the only minority it’s permissible to maim and murder on screen with relish and enjoyment — excepting Arabs in gung-ho movies about the Gulf War, of course.
Race hate
Zionist groups such as Poale Zion often come up with scare stories about bad-taste computer games supposedly found on the Internet, even though, on further examination, these invariably turn out to be figments of their confused and over-active imaginations. But I have a real example of a racist computer game for you. It’s called Redneck Rampage. The object of this ‘game’ is to kill as many Hillbillies (so named, incidentally, because so many of these mountain-folk, descended largely from Ulster Presbyterian refugees from poverty and Anglican religious persecution, were Christened ‘William’), by blasting them with sawn-off shotguns or braining them with crowbars. You can even blow up a Hillbilly with sticks of dynamite as he sits on an outside lavatory. Tee hee!
Or how about Wolfenstein 3D, a computer game which invites you to massacre German soldiers? A good player can amass a big pile of dead Germans, with scattered helmets, blood and blond hair all over the computer screen. If that isn’t race hatred, what is?
One of the errors of the nationalist movement has been that we have fought according to our opponents’ agendas, as expected of us, rather than using their own arguments against them.
It is instructive to note, for example, that the police have been responsible for by far the largest percentage of killings and injuries suffered by immigrants in Europe. Those groups quaintly termed ‘extremist’ or ‘neo-Nazi’ hardly register on the scale, accounting for little more than a few broken windows and beery brawls, with the more serious incidents more often than not attributable to agents provocateurs working for the security services.
Without consent
So the ‘extremists’ have in fact been less guilty than the authorities, in the face of an unnatural experiment being carried out without consent in circumstances of increasing uncertainty and economic decline. The real threat to both black and white comes not from racial nationalism but from a demented liberalism, which conceives the world as an immense frontierless sweatshop, peopled by dumbed-down masses of indeterminable stock.
It is liberalism and finance capitalism which are the major forces sustaining racial hatred and ethnocide, just as they once supported the slave trade and the destruction of traditional communities from one end of the globe to the other.
Those who oppose this, whether white nationalists, patriotic Indian Hindus, or members of the Nation of Islam, are demonised by the mass media as ‘haters’, but by opposing multiracialism and New World Order globalisation, we are in fact the last protectors of human dignity, freedom and identity.
Hypocrisy
American revisionist Michael Hoffman summed up perfectly the hypocrisy of the racist ‘anti-racists’ when he wrote the following words to one David Goldman of ‘HateWatch’, an organisation dedicated to exposing and denouncing so-called ‘hate sites’ on the Internet:-
“When you have interviewed the homicidal murderers among the Jewish settlers of occupied Palestine, and after you have interviewed Zionist terrorists in the US, and after you have interviewed the leading bull dyke ‘feminists’ on their hatred of men; and after you have interviewed the top Hollywood directors on their hatred of Christianity, then perhaps I will accept your invitation and debate you for fifteen minutes on your audio program.”
“After which, having lost that debate, you will undoubtedly extend to me the 60 Minutes treatment accorded to Ernst Zundel, and delete my best retorts.”
“When there is a group that opposed hatred of Germans, hatred of ‘rednecks;, hatred of men and hatred of Palestinians (along with hatred of Jewish people or black people just because they are Jewish or black), I would be interested in supporting such an independent, iconoclastic group.”
“Based on your track record, however, ‘HateWatch’ is a proponent of hate, part and parcel of the same senile, ADL-style process of stigmata, whereby anyone who defies the Zionist agenda becomes demonised as a ‘hater’. It’s a clever way to destroy an opponent — render him a witch, rather than a dissident.”
In a way, it is natural and inevitable that a crumbling Establishment should try to demonise its opponents as ‘racists’ and ‘haters’. But, in truth, the terms apply to them, so we should take every opportunity to fling these buzzwords back in their faces.
Many more such propaganda gems, as well as virtual museums of the persecution and Holocausts of the Palestinians and the East European victims of Bolshevism, can be found on Mike Hoffman’s website: www.hoffman-info.com. Readers still trapped in the Paper Age should send £5 for a copy of his Revisionist History magazine and tape/book list to: Independent History & Research, PO Box 849, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83816, USA.
